- The second sexism is sexism against men and boys
- David Benatar is a respected South African philosopher
- Online "men's rights movement" (see this movie)
- "So unrecognized is the second sexism that the mere mention of it will appear laughable to some." (Benatar, p. 177)
- Wants it to be recognized, but is he saying "the second sexism" is worse than "the first sexism"?
Defining terms
- SEX, GENDER
- Benatar uses gender terms (man, woman) interchangeably with sex terms (male, female)
- doesn't address distinction between cis males and trans males
- SEXISM
- Ann Cudd and Leslie Jones:
- "...On our view sexism is a systematic, pervasive, but often subtle, force that maintains the oppression of women...." ("Sexism," p. 158)
- Kate Manne:
- "sexism should be understood primarily as the 'justificatory' branch of a patriarchal order, which consists in ideology that has the overall function of rationalizing and justifying patriarchal social relations." (Down Girl, p. 79)
- On these views, could there be a second sexism?
- Benatar:
- sexism = sex discrimination
- SEX DISCRIMINATION
- Jennifer Saul, Feminism
- dominance discrimination--whole system is set up so men dominate
- difference discrimination--x and y are just alike in all relevant respects, but x is treated better than y, based on sex
- Benatar:
- "I shall follow the convention of understanding discrimination as the unfair disadvantaging of somebody on the basis of some morally irrelevant feature such as a person's sex." (p. 177)
- direct vs. indirect (example of indirect: the police dept with a height requirement)
- intentional vs. unintentional
- DISADVANTAGE
- non-discriminatory disadvantages
- a non-discriminatory disadvantage of being female is..........
- a non-discriminatory disadvantage of being male is........
- discriminatory disadvantages
- a discriminatory disadvantage of being female is........
- a discriminatory disadvantage of being male is.....(Benatar: unrecognized)
Discriminatory Disadvantages of being male (according to Benatar)
- Are these disadvantages really discriminatory?
- WAR
- "social legal pressures on men....to fight in war" (p. 178)
- 2019: in the US, women may enter combat, but men must (when there is a draft)
- crewcuts
- VIOLENCE
- "Men are much more likely to be the targets of aggression and violence." (p.179)
- SACRIFICE
- "Women and children first" (e.g. the Titanic)
- CORPORAL PUNISHMENT
- Boys hit more often than girls
- SEXUAL ASSAULT
- Not taken seriously when against men.
- CHILD CUSTODY
- "fathers fare worse than mothers with regard to child custody" (p. 181)
- AFFECTION
- Boys receive less affection from their mothers after divorce (p. 182)
- GAY MEN
- More discrimination against them than against lesbians. (p. 182)
- CAPITAL PUNISHMENT
- Imposed on men more than women (p. 183)
Why? Underlying attitudes
- Men's lives valued less than women's
- "women and children first"
- missing women vs. missing men
- Violence against men accepted
- Belief that men are "naturally more aggressive, more violent, less caring, and less nurturing than women are"
Objections (that he tries to counter)
- Not really discriminatory--many of the disadvantages are mere disadvantages
- Distraction--it's more important to focus on sexism against women and girls
- Inversion--look closer, and "the second sexism" turns out to be discrimination against women
- Costs of dominance--problems men have are byproducts of their being dominant
No comments:
Post a Comment